By comparison a max-ish settings and 20-30 FPS minumum CPU before OSM2City would be around a i5 2500 which has a rating of ~1700. As for CPU performance, the single-threaded performance the early reviews talked about is right at the top, better than a Ryzen 9 5950X or an i9-10900k ( link) which has a ratings of approx 35 respectively ( link). Not sure what is going on with CPU performance, looking at the initial article. It seems the M1 doesn't like the airport keep grass overlay or something. Random scenery objects also helps make FG CPU bound, so they could be turned off. Lower flights can use a shorter LoD rough to compensate.
Maybe only using OSM2City buildings would leave FPS a bit better. I think having OSM2City buildings, roads, pylons etc would kill FPS by making it CPU bound. (I don't mean Timi here - I know his main system is pretty fast going by other videos in his channel, and he likely just brought the M1 as a low-power/mobile secondary computer)Ībout 7-p, and max settings (I think the performance monitor may be heavy on the CPU). People finding FG tend to have bought regularly marketed hardware, so at the very least they'll have slower hardware - as they don't know about CPU/GPU bottlenecks, or look at lists of relative benchmarks when looking at options for hardware. This latest trend is not so good from the perspective of people having better hardware, and FG rendering being able to assume more people being able to enjoy higher settings. So this APU trend will /likely/ mean the desktop quality laptop hardware, which is finally no longer battery hungry, gets pushed to higher priced 3d performance laptops - and more underpowered APU laptops get marketed as regularly priced laptops.
Flightgear for mac review Pc#
APU/SoCs don't have to be slow by nature - the new AMD consoles are also APU/SoCs but they sync with more recent PC hardware (GPU equivalent to a RTX 2080). These laptops are very good on battery life being SoCs, but Apple's primary motivation in switching to their own CPU designs appears to be cost saving and a larger profit margin (in the very long run anyway, as yields take time to improve and chip production is an operation that needs large scale) - up-to 40-60% according to google. If the 1st version is this slow it means there are probably going to be more people in the future with laptops that are under powered, than without the APUs. And just when it looked like the reduction in power looked like laptops people generally would catch up with desktops or 3d laptops. Not sure what to think about this latest APU trend (the slowest laptops until now were non-3d based Intel integrated GPUs and the recent AMD APUs). Thier plan is to switch all, or at least most, of the lineup to their own designs. I thought it would do a bit better for a current release.Īpple started with the lower end in rolling out their APU/SOCs. There were some benchmarks that indicated performance around GTX 1050, which is about 5 years old now (GTX 3000's are the current gen).
Flightgear for mac review 1080p#
The resolution to test should be 1080p or lower (the video says 4k but that might just be upscaling). Edit: you may be CPU bound(?), the GPU utilisation stats or reducing window size should give an idea.
Is the GPU capability of the Apple M1 not powerful as advertised? What type of settings can you get without photoscenery, is it too slow for trees.
0 kommentar(er)
